NOTES ON FIXATION OF PAY OF REEMPLOYED EXSERVICEMEN CASE
FIXATION ELIGIBILITY:-
1] DOPT OM NO. 3/13/2008-ESTT[PAY-II] 11TH NOVEMBER 2008
2] DOPT OM NO. 3/19/2009-ESTT[PAY-II] DT. 5TH AUGUST 2010
PRESCRIBES THE MANNER OF FIXATION OF PAY IN R/O REEMPLOYED EX SERVICEMEN.
THESE OMs are clearly defined with examples by PF ORGANISATIONRAILWAYS,THE CGDA[CONTROLER GENERAL OF DEFENCE ACCOUNTS]& ALSO THE CAT JUDGEMENT IN R/O SE RLY ENDORSED IT.
DEPARTMENTS SO FAR IMPLIMENTED THESE ORDERS
A] INCOME TAX
B] MINISTRY OF LABOUR
C] EPFO
D] RAILWAYS[SER& SCR]
E] ALL PUBLIC SECTOR BANKS
F] ALL PSU’s
G] MINISTRY OF DEFENCE
3. 1. STATUS IN DEPT. OF POSTS
IMPLIMENTED IN:-
A] DELHI CIRCLE, B] UP CIRCLE, C] BIHAR CIRCLE,
D] RAJASTAN CIRCLE
B] POSITION IN A.P. CIRCLE
In fact there are three catagories exist in A.P CIRCLE
[I] PERSONEL GIVEN FIXATION AS PER THE OM’s AND CONTINUE
TO DRAW TILL DATE
[2] PERSONNEL GIVEN FIXATION AS PER THE OM’s BUT REVERTED
TO PREVIOUS PAY DUE TO DA[P] OBJECTIONS
[3] PERSONNEL YET TO BE CONSIDERED:- DESPITE THE
REPEATED REQUESTS& RAISING THE ISSUE IN RJCM AND
PROOFS SUBMITTED IN SUPPORT OF THE CLAIM
UNFORTUNATELY DEPT. IS LACKING CLARITY PARTICULARLY IN A.P. CIRCLE BECAUSE:-
[1] IN REPLY TO INFORMATION SUPPLIED UNDER RTI DOPT CLEARLY STATED THAT “ FIXATION TO EXSERVICEMEN IS BEING GIVEN THROUGHOUT THE COUNTRY”
BUT IT IS NOT TRUE.
[2] DEPT. REFERRED THE MATTER TO DOPT FOR CLEAR ORDERS
[3] BEFORE RECEIVING CLARIFICATION SAME WAS IMPLIMENTED IN SOME
CIRCLES LIKE UP,BIHAR,RAJASTAN WHICH CLEARLY PROVES THAT THERE IS NO AMBIQUITY IN THE ORDER AND IT IS VERY CLEAR.
IN THIS BACKGROUND ALL EXSERVICEMEN ARE REQUESTING THE UNION TO PERSUE THE MATTER VIGOUROUSLY AND SEE THAT THESE ORDERS ARE IMPLIMENTED AS EARLY AS POSSIBLE,IF NESCERRY BYINCLUDING IT AS ITEM IN THE CHARTER OF DEMANDS IN THE ENSUING INDEFENITE STRIKE.BY THIS ACT WE CAN PUT A FULL STOP TO THE AGONY OF THOUSANDS OF EXSERVICEMEN WHO ARE RECRUITED IN THE DEPARTMENT AGAINST EXSERVICEMEN QUOTA.
EXSERVICE MEN IN THE DEPARTMENT ARE FEELING THAT THEY ARE DISCRIMINATED WHEN COMPARED WITH OTHERS RECRUITED IN OTHER DEPARTMENTS.
AS SUCH THIS MAY BE TAKEN UP AS IMPORTANT ITEM TO BE SETTLED.
FIXATION ELIGIBILITY:-
1] DOPT OM NO. 3/13/2008-ESTT[PAY-II] 11TH NOVEMBER 2008
2] DOPT OM NO. 3/19/2009-ESTT[PAY-II] DT. 5TH AUGUST 2010
PRESCRIBES THE MANNER OF FIXATION OF PAY IN R/O REEMPLOYED EX SERVICEMEN.
THESE OMs are clearly defined with examples by PF ORGANISATIONRAILWAYS,THE CGDA[CONTROLER GENERAL OF DEFENCE ACCOUNTS]& ALSO THE CAT JUDGEMENT IN R/O SE RLY ENDORSED IT.
DEPARTMENTS SO FAR IMPLIMENTED THESE ORDERS
A] INCOME TAX
B] MINISTRY OF LABOUR
C] EPFO
D] RAILWAYS[SER& SCR]
E] ALL PUBLIC SECTOR BANKS
F] ALL PSU’s
G] MINISTRY OF DEFENCE
3. 1. STATUS IN DEPT. OF POSTS
IMPLIMENTED IN:-
A] DELHI CIRCLE, B] UP CIRCLE, C] BIHAR CIRCLE,
D] RAJASTAN CIRCLE
B] POSITION IN A.P. CIRCLE
In fact there are three catagories exist in A.P CIRCLE
[I] PERSONEL GIVEN FIXATION AS PER THE OM’s AND CONTINUE
TO DRAW TILL DATE
[2] PERSONNEL GIVEN FIXATION AS PER THE OM’s BUT REVERTED
TO PREVIOUS PAY DUE TO DA[P] OBJECTIONS
[3] PERSONNEL YET TO BE CONSIDERED:- DESPITE THE
REPEATED REQUESTS& RAISING THE ISSUE IN RJCM AND
PROOFS SUBMITTED IN SUPPORT OF THE CLAIM
UNFORTUNATELY DEPT. IS LACKING CLARITY PARTICULARLY IN A.P. CIRCLE BECAUSE:-
[1] IN REPLY TO INFORMATION SUPPLIED UNDER RTI DOPT CLEARLY STATED THAT “ FIXATION TO EXSERVICEMEN IS BEING GIVEN THROUGHOUT THE COUNTRY”
BUT IT IS NOT TRUE.
[2] DEPT. REFERRED THE MATTER TO DOPT FOR CLEAR ORDERS
[3] BEFORE RECEIVING CLARIFICATION SAME WAS IMPLIMENTED IN SOME
CIRCLES LIKE UP,BIHAR,RAJASTAN WHICH CLEARLY PROVES THAT THERE IS NO AMBIQUITY IN THE ORDER AND IT IS VERY CLEAR.
IN THIS BACKGROUND ALL EXSERVICEMEN ARE REQUESTING THE UNION TO PERSUE THE MATTER VIGOUROUSLY AND SEE THAT THESE ORDERS ARE IMPLIMENTED AS EARLY AS POSSIBLE,IF NESCERRY BYINCLUDING IT AS ITEM IN THE CHARTER OF DEMANDS IN THE ENSUING INDEFENITE STRIKE.BY THIS ACT WE CAN PUT A FULL STOP TO THE AGONY OF THOUSANDS OF EXSERVICEMEN WHO ARE RECRUITED IN THE DEPARTMENT AGAINST EXSERVICEMEN QUOTA.
EXSERVICE MEN IN THE DEPARTMENT ARE FEELING THAT THEY ARE DISCRIMINATED WHEN COMPARED WITH OTHERS RECRUITED IN OTHER DEPARTMENTS.
AS SUCH THIS MAY BE TAKEN UP AS IMPORTANT ITEM TO BE SETTLED.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please include here your valueable comments on the subject.